首页> 外文OA文献 >'We Do Not Hang Around. It Is Forbidden': Immigration and the Criminalisation of Youth Hanging around in the Netherlands
【2h】

'We Do Not Hang Around. It Is Forbidden': Immigration and the Criminalisation of Youth Hanging around in the Netherlands

机译:'我们不要闲逛。它是被禁止的:在荷兰闲逛的年轻人的移民和定罪

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

textabstractThe focus in this article is the ‘criminalisation’ of youth hanging around with the emergence of bans on hanging around. A critical social constructivist approach is used in this study, which draws predominantly on qualitative primary data collected between the late 1980s and 2010s. The article compares indigenous with immigrant youth, which coincides with, respectively, youth in rural communities and youth in urban communities. This study shows that there is discrimination of immigrant youth, which is shaped by several intertwining social phenomena, such as the ‘geography of policing’ – more police in urban areas – familiarity, sharing biographical information (in smaller communities), and the character of the interaction, normalising versus stigmatising. In further research on this topic we have to study (the reaction to) the transgressions of immigrant youth, and compare it with (the reaction to) the transgressions of indigenous youth, which is a blind spot in Dutch criminology.
机译:本文的重点是随着闲逛禁令的出现,青年闲逛的“犯罪化”。这项研究使用了一种批判性的社会建构主义方法,该方法主要利用了1980年代末至2010年代末收集的定性原始数据。该文章将土著青年和移民青年进行了比较,这分别与农村社区的青年和城市社区的青年相吻合。这项研究表明,对移民青年的歧视是由多种相互交织的社会现象造成的,例如“治安地理” –城市地区更多的警察–熟悉度,(在较小的社区中)共享传记信息以及互动,归一化与污名化。在对该主题的进一步研究中,我们必须研究移民青年的犯罪行为(对它的反应),并将其与土著青年的犯罪行为(对它的反应)进行比较,这是荷兰犯罪学的一个盲点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Müller, Thaddeus;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号